Prediction of Tossaporn Summa vs Kilmeny Waterman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Summa vs K. Waterman

Tossaporn Summa

THA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

460

Best Rank

416

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Kilmeny Waterman

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

460

Best Rank

416

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Summa 1 - 0 Waterman

They have played 3 sets in total, with Tossaporn Summa winning 2 and Kilmeny Waterman winning 1. The last match between Tossaporn Summa and Kilmeny Waterman was at the ITF Hat Yai, 03-09-1990, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(4) 4-6 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Summa	1
Waterman	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) ITF Hat Yai(09-03-90)

Stats

Tossaporn Summa

Kilmeny Waterman

T. Summa vs K. Waterman H2H Profile

T. Summa	Stats	K. Waterman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
42.31% (11-15)	Career Total W/L	17.19% (11-53)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Summa vs K. Waterman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tossaporn Summa has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Kilmeny Waterman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tossaporn Summa, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kilmeny Waterman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Tossaporn Summa has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kilmeny Waterman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Tossaporn Summa has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Kilmeny Waterman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Tossaporn Summa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 11/14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Kilmeny Waterman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 2/9), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Tossaporn Summa has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Kilmeny Waterman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tossaporn Summa winning 1 times and Kilmeny Waterman being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tossaporn Summa winning 2 and Kilmeny Waterman winning 1.
The last match between Tossaporn Summa and Kilmeny Waterman was at the ITF Hat Yai, 03-09-1990, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(4) 4-6 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tossaporn Summa has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Kilmeny Waterman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tossaporn Summa has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kilmeny Waterman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Tossaporn Summa has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kilmeny Waterman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Tossaporn Summa vs Kilmeny Waterman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Summa vs K. Waterman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Summa	Stats	K. Waterman
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
17	Games Won	13
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Summa Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Pattaya - 15-04-1991
Q2 Maria Jose LlorcaM. Jose	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Q1 Krisna SummaK. Summa	W	4-6 6-4 7-5	Stats
ITF Perth - 19-11-1990
Q2 Donna BlackwellD. Blackwell	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
ITF Nuriootpa - 12-11-1990
Q1 Katrina CrawfordK. Crawford	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
ITF Mount Gambier - 05-11-1990
R3 Angela KerekA. Kerek	L	6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

K. Waterman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Leawood - 05-10-1992
Q1 Anne MallA. Mall	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Indianapolis - 11-11-1991
Q1 Tatiana IgnatievaT. Ignatieva	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
San Juan - 21-10-1991
Q1 Luanne SpadeaL. Spadea	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Montreal - 05-08-1991
Q1 Camille BenjaminC. Benjamin	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Houston - 15-04-1991
Q1 Tammy WhittingtonT. Whittington	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

T. Summa vs K. Waterman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Summa	Stats	K. Waterman
42.31% (11/15)	YTD Win/Loss	17.19% (11/53)
42.59% (23/31)	Sets Win/Loss	19.57% (27/111)
46.70% (219/250)	Games Win/Loss	35.12% (407/752)
44.00% (11/14)	Hard Win/Loss	18.00% (9/41)
0% (0/0)	Clay Win/Loss	18.18% (2/9)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0.00% (0/1)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
439.04	Average Opponent Rank	0
25.00% (1/3)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
45.00% (9/11)	Challenger W/L	21.43% (9/33)
0% (0/0)	Futures W/L	0.00% (0/1)
42% (10/24)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	16% (10/63)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	33% (1/3)
60% (3/5)	Deciding Set Win %	33% (3/9)
90% (10/9)	1st Set Won, Won Match	75% (12/9)
10% (10/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	25% (12/3)
13% (15/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	2% (52/1)